From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from imr1.aus.deuba.com ([203.0.62.7]) by hawkwind.utcs.utoronto.ca with SMTP id <51162>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:28:34 -0500 Received: from bmr1-e1.aus.deuba.com by imr1.aus.deuba.com id f843GSh27598; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:16:29 +1000 (EST) Received: from mailhost.aus.deuba.com [10.179.4.6] by bmr1-e1.aus.deuba.com id f843GS609985; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:16:28 +1000 (EST) Received: from merton.aus.deuba.com (merton.aus.deuba.com [10.179.88.22]) by mailhost.aus.deuba.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA16872 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:16:27 +1000 (EST) Received: (from callum@localhost) by merton.aus.deuba.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f843GRP17441 for rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:16:27 +1000 From: Callum Gibson Message-Id: <200109040316.f843GRP17441@merton.aus.deuba.com> Subject: Re: $^t To: rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:16:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200109040143.f841ht416783@rakitzis.com> from "byron@rakitzis.com" at Sep 03, 2001 09:43:55 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit byron@rakitzis.com writes: }That being said now that Plan 9 is more open perhaps the more }superficial incompatabilities should be normalized, if possible. FWIW, I think $^t is more logical since it conserves special chars, even if it reverses the sense of the ^ operator. (c)2001 Callum Gibson callum.gibson@db.com Global Markets IT, Deutsche Bank, Australia 61 2 9258 1620 ### The opinions in this message are mine and not Deutsche's ###