From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from holly.harlequin.co.uk ([193.128.4.58]) by hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu with SMTP id <2237>; Wed, 19 May 1993 05:24:40 -0400 Received: from piaget.harlqn.co.uk (piaget.harlequin.co.uk) by holly.harlequin.co.uk; Wed, 19 May 1993 10:24:45 +0100 Received: from morris.harlqn.co.uk by piaget.harlqn.co.uk; Wed, 19 May 93 10:24:39 BST From: Richard Brooksby Date: Wed, 19 May 1993 05:21:29 -0400 Message-Id: <20399.9305190921@morris.harlqn.co.uk> To: rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu, es@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu Subject: May I suggest we digestify the rc and es lists? Much as I enjoy corresponding about rc and es I am finding that my mailbox, which is already overloaded, is becoming even more so. I am even considering unsubscribing (to es at least) simply because I do not have the time. May I suggest that the rc and es lists are made into digests at the distribution site? I would much prefer to receive a daily message containing correspondence, even though it would slow down the reaction time somewhat. (Actually, in my experience, slowing down the reaction time often improves the content of a list.) Is this technically feasible? Do others agree that this would be a good thing? Please consider this carefully. I beleive I have something to contribute; it would be a shame if I didn't have the chance. --- Richard Brooksby ML Project / Symbolic Processing Division / Harlequin +44 223 872522