rc-list - mailing list for the rc(1) shell
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Haahr <paul@paulhaahr.com>
To: rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu
Subject: Re: rc 1.6 $version
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 13:43:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ZFwtjf51i@dmul.paulhaahr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020327221226.A25153@strozzi.it>

Tim wrote
> Any objections to `rc_version'?

I'd prefer $rc-version, but either should be fine.

However, making it such a magic variable feels silly.  As Eric noted,
having assignments to a variable just be eaten without warning seems,
er, surprising at best.

Why not just initialize version (provided there's none set in the
environment?), not export it, and have any assignments turn it into a
normal variable.  I think that's pretty easy to do.

Carlo wrote:
> rc already has a few reserved variable names, like $pid, $bqstatus,
> $status [...]  and my suggestion is to set the `rc_' prefix aside for
> rc reserved variables. We would then have rc_path, rc_home,
> rc_whatever. Of course, for backward compatibility we will continue to
> have also $pid, $path and that, but from now on there whould at least
> be a standard for any new rc needs, and that could be documented in
> the man page.

No!  No!  No!

I understand why one might want to prefix ``version'' -- this is rc's
version, not a system-wide version -- but your path, home directory,
etc, are exported and global properties.  (The path/PATH distinction,
etc, is just backwards compatibility, after all.)

One of the points of rc is that it uses so few special variables that we
don't need special namespaces.


  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-30 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-14 22:37 erik quanstrom
2002-03-27 13:27 ` Tim Goodwin
2002-03-27 21:12   ` Carlo Strozzi
2002-03-30 18:43     ` Paul Haahr [this message]
2002-03-31 15:13       ` Carlo Strozzi
2002-04-03 14:31       ` Tim Goodwin
2002-04-03 15:06         ` Paul Haahr
2002-04-04 10:04       ` Tim Goodwin
2002-04-04 21:42         ` Scott Schwartz
2002-04-04 21:54 Byron Rakitzis
2002-04-05  8:35 ` Tim Goodwin
2002-04-05  1:38 Smarasderagd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ZFwtjf51i@dmul.paulhaahr.com \
    --to=paul@paulhaahr.com \
    --cc=rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu \
    --subject='Re: rc 1.6 $version' \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).