From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from central.cis.upenn.edu ([130.91.6.1]) by archone.tamu.edu with SMTP id <22537>; Mon, 19 Aug 1991 15:26:38 -0500 Received: from SAUL.CIS.UPENN.EDU by central.cis.upenn.edu id AA22696; Mon, 19 Aug 91 16:26:16 -0400 Received: from LOCALHOST by saul.cis.upenn.edu id AA25383; Mon, 19 Aug 91 16:26:15 EDT Resent-Message-Id: <9108192026.AA25383@saul.cis.upenn.edu> Message-Id: <9108192026.AA25383@saul.cis.upenn.edu> Return-Path: mjd@saul.cis.upenn.edu Posted-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 91 16:25:48 -0400 Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 91 16:25:49 EDT To: rc@tamu.archone.edu Cc: mjd@saul.cis.upenn.edu Subject: Re: apid as a list In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Aug 91 12:54:58 CDT." <91Aug19.125506cdt.22531@archone.tamu.edu> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1991 15:25:48 -0500 From: Mark-Jason Dominus Resent-To: rc@archone.tamu.edu Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1991 15:26:15 -0500 Resent-From: Mark-Jason Dominus It's not clear to me that there is enough new functionality to justify another feature. Perhaps you should improve the `wait' command instead, so that it in some way returns the PID of the child process it reaped.