From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from central.cis.upenn.edu ([130.91.6.1]) by archone.tamu.edu with SMTP id <22537>; Mon, 19 Aug 1991 15:26:38 -0500
Received: from SAUL.CIS.UPENN.EDU by central.cis.upenn.edu
	id AA22696; Mon, 19 Aug 91 16:26:16 -0400
Received: from LOCALHOST by saul.cis.upenn.edu
	id AA25383; Mon, 19 Aug 91 16:26:15 EDT
Resent-Message-Id: <9108192026.AA25383@saul.cis.upenn.edu>
Message-Id: <9108192026.AA25383@saul.cis.upenn.edu>
Return-Path: mjd@saul.cis.upenn.edu
Posted-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 91 16:25:48 -0400
Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 91 16:25:49 EDT
To: rc@tamu.archone.edu
Cc: mjd@saul.cis.upenn.edu
Subject: Re: apid as a list 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Aug 91 12:54:58 CDT."
             <91Aug19.125506cdt.22531@archone.tamu.edu> 
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1991 15:25:48 -0500
From: Mark-Jason Dominus <mjd@saul.cis.upenn.edu>
Resent-To: rc@archone.tamu.edu
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1991 15:26:15 -0500
Resent-From: Mark-Jason Dominus <mjd@saul.cis.upenn.edu>


It's not clear to me that there is enough new functionality to justify
another feature.  Perhaps you should improve the `wait' command instead,
so that it in some way returns the PID of the child process it reaped.