* Re: should rc SIG_IGN SIGTSTP, SIGTTIN, and SIGTTOU?
@ 1991-08-28 13:10 Chet Ramey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chet Ramey @ 1991-08-28 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cks; +Cc: rc, chet
> All the /bin/sh's I can check around here do when they're a login shell
> (and pass this onto their children), presumably as a signal to
> applications such as less or vi to not try to suspend themselves.
> Should rc duplicate this behavior?
Doesn't login do this? The BSD login sets the TSTP handler to SIG_IGN, and
the BSD init handles TTIN and TTOU. It's up to shells that understand the
peculiarities of job control to change the handling to something else.
Chet
--
``Someday soon, I'm gonna tell the world about the crying game...''
Chet Ramey Internet: chet@po.CWRU.Edu
Case Western Reserve University NeXT Mail: chet@macbeth.INS.CWRU.Edu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* should rc SIG_IGN SIGTSTP, SIGTTIN, and SIGTTOU?
@ 1991-08-27 22:11 Chris Siebenmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Siebenmann @ 1991-08-27 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rc
All the /bin/sh's I can check around here do when they're a login shell
(and pass this onto their children), presumably as a signal to
applications such as less or vi to not try to suspend themselves.
Should rc duplicate this behavior?
- cks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1991-08-28 13:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1991-08-28 13:10 should rc SIG_IGN SIGTSTP, SIGTTIN, and SIGTTOU? Chet Ramey
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1991-08-27 22:11 Chris Siebenmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).