From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from milton.u.washington.edu ([128.95.136.1]) by archone.tamu.edu with SMTP id <19044>; Mon, 30 Sep 1991 10:55:00 -0500
Received: by milton.u.washington.edu
	(5.65/UW-NDC Revision: 2.1 ) id AA28485; Mon, 30 Sep 91 08:54:49 -0700
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1991 10:54:49 -0500
From: Donn Cave <donn@milton.u.washington.edu>
Message-Id: <9109301554.AA28485@milton.u.washington.edu>
To: rc@archone.tamu.edu
Subject: Re: exec'ing with relative pathname

The Bourne shell behavior seems simpler to explain and, nine times out
of ten, more useful.  Maybe someone who's more familiar with Plan 9
could provide some insight into this odd design choice?

	Donn Cave, University Computing Services, University of Washington
	donn@cac.washington.edu