From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from relay1.UU.NET ([137.39.1.5]) by archone.tamu.edu with SMTP id <45323>; Fri, 17 Apr 1992 17:19:24 -0500
Received: from uunet.uu.net (via LOCALHOST.UU.NET) by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA17804; Fri, 17 Apr 92 18:19:08 -0400
Received: from srg.UUCP by uunet.uu.net with UUCP/RMAIL
	(queueing-rmail) id 181858.6158; Fri, 17 Apr 1992 18:18:58 EDT
Received: from ceres.srg.af.mil by srg.srg.af.mil
	id aa11496; Fri, 17 Apr 92 17:54:43 EDT
From: culliton@srg.af.mil (Tom Culliton x2278)
X-Mailer: SCO System V Mail (version 3.2)
To: rc@archone.tamu.edu
Subject: rc and readline and SIGINT
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 16:52:51 -0500
Message-Id: <9204171752.aa00070@ceres.srg.af.mil>

Well, I'm going to throw this one open to everyone and maybe someone like
Chet will read it and come up with a good answer.

Under rc-1.2 with or without readline if I hit the key for SIGINT it
aborted the current input line.  This was good and righteous and all that.

Under rc-1.3 with readline it no longer seemed to work right.  Since
1.3 had signal handling (and other) problems it was hard to be sure
what the trouble was.

Under rc-1.4beta without readline SIGINT works as expected/desired and
aborts the line.  With readline the line doesn't get executed, but it
doesn't get cleared or quit either and further input is accepted but
not executed.  Furthermore if signal handling in readline is disabled
the key loses it's meaning as SIGINT!  (This is strictly readlines
"fault")

While I can live with this, it is rather unaesthetic and just plain
bugs me.  Any clues?

Tom