From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from relay1.UU.NET ([137.39.1.5]) by archone.tamu.edu with SMTP id <45321>; Fri, 24 Apr 1992 19:17:11 -0500
Received: from uunet.uu.net (via LOCALHOST.UU.NET) by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA28792; Fri, 24 Apr 92 20:16:45 -0400
Received: from srg.UUCP by uunet.uu.net with UUCP/RMAIL
	(queueing-rmail) id 201312.3836; Fri, 24 Apr 1992 20:13:12 EDT
Received: from ceres.srg.af.mil by srg.srg.af.mil
	id aa09002; Fri, 24 Apr 92 17:49:13 EDT
From: culliton@srg.af.mil (Tom Culliton x2278)
X-Mailer: SCO System V Mail (version 3.2)
To: rc@archone.tamu.edu
Subject: Re: rc and readline and SIGINT
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1992 16:46:31 -0500
Message-Id: <9204241746.aa01849@ceres.srg.af.mil>

Well this is the first chance I've had to really take a good look at
what Chet had to say on the topic and relate it to the the rc code. 
>From looking at signal.c, util.c, and wait.c it looks like the problem
would be easily solved by treating readline as a "slow" system call. 
Before I plunge into this, can anybody think of reasons that this would
be a bad idea?  Byron?

Tom