From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from techfac.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de ([129.70.132.100]) by hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu with SMTP id <2670>; Thu, 4 Jun 1992 06:05:50 -0400
Received: from dahlie.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE by techfac.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de (5.65+bind 1.7+ida 1.4.2/tp.270592)
	id AA06735; Thu, 4 Jun 92 12:05:08 +0200
Received: by dahlie.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de (4.1/tp.29.0890)
	id AA01785; Thu, 4 Jun 92 12:05:06 +0200
Date:	Thu, 4 Jun 1992 06:05:06 -0400
From:	malte@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de
Message-Id: <9206041005.AA01785@dahlie.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de>
To:	rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu
Subject: Re: $pid 
In-Reply-To: Mail from 'Chris Siebenmann <cks@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu>'
      dated: 	Thu, 4 Jun 1992 05:07:34 -0400

I don't think echo `{ echo $pid } should be different from echo $pid because
I don't really want know that backquote substitution requieres a fork(2).
Of course, shell functions and explicit subshell commands "@{ .. }" should.

Malte.