From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from groucho.cs.psu.edu ([130.203.2.10]) by archone.tamu.edu with SMTP id <45316>; Sat, 11 Apr 1992 18:09:50 -0500
Received: by groucho.cs.psu.edu id <2603>; Sat, 11 Apr 1992 19:09:32 -0400
From: Scott Schwartz <schwartz@groucho.cs.psu.edu>
To: rc@archone.tamu.edu
Subject: more ile stuff
Message-Id: <92Apr11.190932edt.2603@groucho.cs.psu.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 18:09:25 -0500


What do you all think of this change to ile's irupt()?  In some cases
it makes interrupts seem cleaner.

  irupt(c)
      char	c;
  {
      int zero = 0;
      erase_line(c);
      pass(c);
      if (ioctl (1, TIOCFLUSH, &zero) < 0)
        perror("ioctl/flush");
  }