From: Byron Rakitzis <byron>
To: rc
Subject: echo builtin
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1992 00:47:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92Feb9.004743cst.45333@archone.tamu.edu> (raw)
Should echo use getopt(3)? It seems like overkill, and yet it would
make echo consistent with whatis, and indeed with rc's initialization.
However, it bothers me that
echo -f
would draw an error.
Opinions? If you like, you can mail to me and I will summarize to
the list.
reply other threads:[~1992-02-09 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=92Feb9.004743cst.45333@archone.tamu.edu \
--to=rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).