From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ben.britain.eu.net ([192.91.199.254]) by hawkwind.utcs.utoronto.ca with SMTP id <24079>; Wed, 3 Aug 1994 03:24:59 -0400 Received: from a.gec-epl.co.uk by ben.britain.eu.net via PSS with NIFTP (PP) id ; Wed, 3 Aug 1994 08:15:07 +0100 Received: from zombie.gec-epl.co.uk (zombie.limbo.gec-epl.co.uk) by vampire.gec-epl.co.uk (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA24042; Wed, 3 Aug 1994 08:19:15 +0000 Received: by zombie.gec-epl.co.uk (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA29124; Wed, 3 Aug 1994 08:12:41 +0000 Date: Wed, 3 Aug 1994 04:12:41 -0400 From: steve@cegelecproj.co.uk (Steve_Kilbane) Message-Id: <9408030712.AA29124@zombie.gec-epl.co.uk> To: rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu Subject: Re: A general desire for rc 1.5/1.6 X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII X-Face: Iqsa(US9p?)Y^W+6Ff[Z]rM"uFE) lFDjag1e]\/#2 > From: Scott Schwartz > One thing I'd like to see for 1.6 is some utility routines abstracted > out into libraries. [...] > If similar things were done to the globber and glomer you could get > shell globbing in other programs (in opposition to the unix tradition > of not reusing code.) Hmm. sounds a bit like tcl to me. Still, I had considered a while back that it would be useful to write a shell (Bourne, I was thinking, specifically), library by library for this very reason. Variable expansion was going to be the first thing to do, since that's more generally useful than wildcard expansion ("Why *can't* I enter $HOME/my_file in this text field?"). But of course, real work intruded. Now I'll just use tcl. :-) steve