From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from weaver-gw.netapp.com ([198.95.224.2]) by hawkwind.utcs.utoronto.ca with SMTP id <24673>; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 18:59:17 -0500
Received: from netapp.com ([192.9.200.1]) by weaver.netapp.com with SMTP id <15957-124>; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 12:23:19 -0000
Received: by netapp.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA25980; Wed, 2 Apr 97 12:24:39 PST
Date:	Wed, 2 Apr 1997 15:24:39 -0500
From:	byron@netapp.com (Byron Rakitzis)
Message-Id: <9704022024.AA25980@netapp.com>
To:	byron@netapp.com, schwartz@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: autoconfig
Cc:	rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu

>But it works just barely well enough for SunOS, which has no /dev/fd

Ok, I'm convinced that people use named pipes w/rc! It will be no
problem to leave it as-is.

>| > #define NOJOB

>| Does anyone use this? It forces sh-like semantics for backgrounding.
>If anyone ever ports it to Plan 9, it might be handy.

Well, NOJOB *forces* sh-like semantics for backgrounding, but those
semantics are used by default when the SIGTT* signals are undefined:

#if !defined(NOJOB) && defined(SIGTTOU) && defined(SIGTTIN) && defined(SIGTSTP)
                        setsigdefaults(FALSE);
			[...]

I'm asking whether anyone forces NOJOB on a job-control Unix.

Byron.