From: "artemb (Artem Borodkin) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org>
To: ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
Cc: "artemb (Artem Borodkin)" <noreply@ruby-lang.org>
Subject: [ruby-core:119505] [Ruby master Feature#20793] Allow Multiple Arguments for the .is_a? Method
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:21:51 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-110120.20241010112150.53214@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <redmine.issue-20793.20241010085019.53214@ruby-lang.org>
Issue #20793 has been updated by artemb (Artem Borodkin).
Eregon (Benoit Daloze) wrote in #note-2:
> I think pattern matching should be used here instead
Very nice, thank you!
If kind_of? (and alias is_a?) has a strong implementation optimization, I agree that this is not so important enhancement.
----------------------------------------
Feature #20793: Allow Multiple Arguments for the .is_a? Method
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20793#change-110120
* Author: artemb (Artem Borodkin)
* Status: Open
----------------------------------------
I propose allowing multiple arguments to be passed to the .is_a? Method imply "OR" semantics:
``` ruby
name.is_a? String, Symbol
```
Currently, we need to write the following to achieve the same functionality:
``` ruby
[String, Symbol].include?(name.class)
```
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
______________________________________________
ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-10 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-10 8:50 [ruby-core:119502] " artemb (Artem Borodkin) via ruby-core
2024-10-10 9:55 ` [ruby-core:119503] " nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) via ruby-core
2024-10-10 10:48 ` [ruby-core:119504] " Eregon (Benoit Daloze) via ruby-core
2024-10-10 11:21 ` artemb (Artem Borodkin) via ruby-core [this message]
2024-11-07 8:58 ` [ruby-core:119794] " matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) via ruby-core
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=redmine.journal-110120.20241010112150.53214@ruby-lang.org \
--to=ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org \
--cc=noreply@ruby-lang.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).