[ruby-core:119663] [Ruby master Bug#20858] multiple parallel assignments are inconsistent

[ruby-core:119663] [Ruby master Bug#20858] multiple parallel assignments are inconsistent

[daveola (David Stellar) via ruby-core]

Issue #20858 has been reported by daveola (David Stellar).

----------------------------------------
Bug #20858: multiple parallel assignments are inconsistent
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20858

* Author: daveola (David Stellar)
* Status: Open
* ruby -v: ruby 3.3.5 (2024-09-03 revision ef084cc8f4) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
I may have terminology wrong, so apologies.  For this bug I'm going to use "multiple assignment" to refer to using multiple assignment operators in a line, such as:

``` ruby
a = b = c = 1
```

And then parallel assignment to refer to doing multiple assignments at the same time using tuples, such as:

``` ruby
a,b = 1, 2
```

Unfortunately combining these is inconsistent.  First of all, just doing this:

``` ruby
a,b = c,d = 3,4
```

Gives us:  **"undefined local variable or method `c' for main (NameError)"**

So if we work around that by defining all our variables, we then get unexpected results:

``` ruby
a = b = c = d = 'foobar'

a,b = c,d = 3,4

puts "Got:  a=#{a} b=#{b} and c=#{c} d=#{d}"
# Got:  a=foobar b=3 and c=foobar d=3

c,d = 3,4
a,b = c,d

puts "Got:  a=#{a} b=#{b} and c=#{c} d=#{d}"
# Got:  a=3 b=4 and c=3 d=4
```


I can imagine that if multiple parallel assignment is not supported that a,b will not get set properly, but it does not follow that c would be undefined by the expression.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 ______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/

[ruby-core:119664] [Ruby master Bug#20858] multiple parallel assignments are inconsistent

[mame (Yusuke Endoh) via ruby-core]

Issue #20858 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh).


Currently, `a, b = c, d = 3, 4` is interpreted as `a, b = c, (d = 3, 4)`. Whether it is good or not.

----------------------------------------
Bug #20858: multiple parallel assignments are inconsistent
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20858#change-110320

* Author: daveola (David Stellar)
* Status: Open
* ruby -v: ruby 3.3.5 (2024-09-03 revision ef084cc8f4) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
I may have terminology wrong, so apologies.  For this bug I'm going to use "multiple assignment" to refer to using multiple assignment operators in a line, such as:

``` ruby
a = b = c = 1
```

And then parallel assignment to refer to doing multiple assignments at the same time using tuples, such as:

``` ruby
a,b = 1, 2
```

Unfortunately combining these is inconsistent.  First of all, just doing this:

``` ruby
a,b = c,d = 3,4
```

Gives us:  **"undefined local variable or method `c' for main (NameError)"**

So if we work around that by defining all our variables, we then get unexpected results:

``` ruby
a = b = c = d = 'foobar'

a,b = c,d = 3,4

puts "Got:  a=#{a} b=#{b} and c=#{c} d=#{d}"
# Got:  a=foobar b=3 and c=foobar d=3

c,d = 3,4
a,b = c,d

puts "Got:  a=#{a} b=#{b} and c=#{c} d=#{d}"
# Got:  a=3 b=4 and c=3 d=4
```


I can imagine that if multiple parallel assignment is not supported that a,b will not get set properly, but it does not follow that c would be undefined by the expression.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 ______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/

[ruby-core:119681] [Ruby master Bug#20858] multiple parallel assignments are inconsistent

[daveola (David Stellar) via ruby-core]

Issue #20858 has been updated by daveola (David Stellar).


mame (Yusuke Endoh) wrote in #note-1:
> Currently, `a, b = c, d = 3, 4` is interpreted as `a, b = c, (d = 3, 4)`. Whether it is good or not.

Ah - that's a good point.  So it can be fixed with:   `a, b = (c, d = 3, 4)`
I didn't see that possibility.  Is there a clear reason why it's interpreted like this?


----------------------------------------
Bug #20858: multiple parallel assignments are inconsistent
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20858#change-110341

* Author: daveola (David Stellar)
* Status: Open
* ruby -v: ruby 3.3.5 (2024-09-03 revision ef084cc8f4) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
I may have terminology wrong, so apologies.  For this bug I'm going to use "multiple assignment" to refer to using multiple assignment operators in a line, such as:

``` ruby
a = b = c = 1
```

And then parallel assignment to refer to doing multiple assignments at the same time using tuples, such as:

``` ruby
a,b = 1, 2
```

Unfortunately combining these is inconsistent.  First of all, just doing this:

``` ruby
a,b = c,d = 3,4
```

Gives us:  **"undefined local variable or method `c' for main (NameError)"**

So if we work around that by defining all our variables, we then get unexpected results:

``` ruby
a = b = c = d = 'foobar'

a,b = c,d = 3,4

puts "Got:  a=#{a} b=#{b} and c=#{c} d=#{d}"
# Got:  a=foobar b=3 and c=foobar d=3

c,d = 3,4
a,b = c,d

puts "Got:  a=#{a} b=#{b} and c=#{c} d=#{d}"
# Got:  a=3 b=4 and c=3 d=4
```


I can imagine that if multiple parallel assignment is not supported that a,b will not get set properly, but it does not follow that c would be undefined by the expression.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 ______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/