ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "wanabe (_ wanabe) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org>
To: ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
Cc: "wanabe (_ wanabe)" <noreply@ruby-lang.org>
Subject: [ruby-core:120130] [Ruby master Bug#20934] `UnboundMethod#bind_call` may cause "double free or corruption" with Ractor
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 04:37:45 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-110880.20241208043743.92@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <redmine.issue-20934.20241207095819.92@ruby-lang.org>

Issue #20934 has been updated by wanabe (_ wanabe).


Thanks for your comment. It looks like a race condition between `rb_method_definition_release()` and `method_definition_addref()`.
Applying the following patch suppressed the problem.

```patch
diff --git a/vm_method.c b/vm_method.c
index 69a533b182..725b2a99ac 100644
--- a/vm_method.c
+++ b/vm_method.c
@@ -518,6 +518,7 @@ static void
 rb_method_definition_release(rb_method_definition_t *def)
 {
     if (def != NULL) {
+        RB_VM_LOCK_ENTER();
         const int reference_count = def->reference_count;
         def->reference_count--;
 
@@ -535,6 +536,7 @@ rb_method_definition_release(rb_method_definition_t *def)
             if (METHOD_DEBUG) fprintf(stderr, "-%p-%s:%d->%d (dec)\n", (void *)def, rb_id2name(def->original_id),
                                       reference_count, def->reference_count);
         }
+        RB_VM_LOCK_LEAVE();
     }
 }
 
@@ -621,9 +623,11 @@ setup_method_cfunc_struct(rb_method_cfunc_t *cfunc, VALUE (*func)(ANYARGS), int
 static rb_method_definition_t *
 method_definition_addref(rb_method_definition_t *def, bool complemented)
 {
+    RB_VM_LOCK_ENTER();
     if (!complemented &&  def->reference_count > 0) def->aliased = true;
     def->reference_count++;
     if (METHOD_DEBUG) fprintf(stderr, "+%p-%s:%d\n", (void *)def, rb_id2name(def->original_id), def->reference_count);
+    RB_VM_LOCK_LEAVE();
     return def;
 }
 
```

But I don't think it is a good idea because the cost would be high.
Hopefully there is a better solution.

----------------------------------------
Bug #20934: `UnboundMethod#bind_call` may cause "double free or corruption" with Ractor
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20934#change-110880

* Author: wanabe (_ wanabe)
* Status: Open
* ruby -v: ruby 3.4.0dev (2024-12-06T18:51:08Z :detached: 8ad6860ff7) +PRISM [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
When I call `UnboundMethod#bind_call` on both main Ractor and child Ractor, probable errors can be encountered.
Here is an issue reproduce script `ractor_issue.rb`.
```
def foo
  10000.times do
    Object.instance_method(:object_id).bind_call(self)
  end
end

Ractor.new { foo }
foo
```

And there are some examples of execution results.

```
$ ./miniruby -v ractor_issue.rb 
ruby 3.4.0dev (2024-12-06T18:51:08Z :detached: 8ad6860ff7) +PRISM [x86_64-linux]
ractor_issue.rb:7: warning: Ractor is experimental, and the behavior may change in future versions of Ruby! Also there are many implementation issues.
double free or corruption (fasttop)
Aborted (core dumped)
```

```
$ ./miniruby -v ractor_issue.rb 
ruby 3.4.0dev (2024-12-06T18:51:08Z :detached: 8ad6860ff7) +PRISM [x86_64-linux]
ractor_issue.rb:7: warning: Ractor is experimental, and the behavior may change in future versions of Ruby! Also there are many implementation issues.
#<Thread:0x00007fc6c16bfb18 run> terminated with exception (report_on_exception is true):
ractor_issue.rb:3:in 'UnboundMethod#bind_call': undefined method 'object_id' for main (NoMethodError)
        from ractor_issue.rb:3:in 'block in Object#foo'
        from <internal:numeric>:257:in 'Integer#times'
        from ractor_issue.rb:2:in 'Object#foo'
        from ractor_issue.rb:8:in '<main>'
```

Please try running it several times, as there is a probability of successful completion.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 ______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-08  4:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-07  9:58 [ruby-core:120128] " wanabe (_ wanabe) via ruby-core
2024-12-07 14:54 ` [ruby-core:120129] " alanwu (Alan Wu) via ruby-core
2024-12-08  4:37 ` wanabe (_ wanabe) via ruby-core [this message]
2024-12-24 19:32 ` [ruby-core:120399] " luke-gru (Luke Gruber) via ruby-core
2025-03-20 21:01 ` [ruby-core:121419] [Ruby " jhawthorn (John Hawthorn) via ruby-core

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=redmine.journal-110880.20241208043743.92@ruby-lang.org \
    --to=ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org \
    --cc=noreply@ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).