From: "ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org>
To: ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
Cc: "ioquatix (Samuel Williams)" <noreply@ruby-lang.org>
Subject: [ruby-core:120812] [Ruby master Bug#21095] Prefer `uname -n` over `hostname` in tests.
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 21:39:31 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-111679.20250128213931.3344@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <redmine.issue-21095.20250128213823.3344@ruby-lang.org>
Issue #21095 has been updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).
Fixed in <https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/d3abee739f4feb91bb9aaae33877d70c8c576db0>.
----------------------------------------
Bug #21095: Prefer `uname -n` over `hostname` in tests.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21095#change-111679
* Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams)
* Status: Closed
* Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: REQUIRED, 3.4: REQUIRED
----------------------------------------
It turns out that `hostname`, while a defacto standard, is not actually a standard in any official sense. On Linux, it's distributed as part of the `inettools` package, and while generally available on other platforms (BSD, Windows, MacOS), it isn't actually part of any standard.
The `name(1)` system call and `uname(2)` command ARE standardised by POSIX and the Open Group, and are included in most base systems without the need to install extra packages (e.g. `inettools` on Linux).
As such, I was requested by the Arch Linux Ruby maintainer, to prefer using `uname -n` as they would like to drop the dependency on `inettools`. See <https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/inetutils/-/issues/2#note_211062> for more context.
I've been asked if this can be back ported to 3.3 and 3.4 and while it's not strictly a bug, it will reduce friction in the distribution channels, so I'd like to propose that we backport to 3.4 and if possible 3.3 too.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
______________________________________________
ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-28 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-28 21:38 [ruby-core:120811] " ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core
2025-01-28 21:39 ` ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core [this message]
2025-01-28 21:58 ` [ruby-core:120813] " Eregon (Benoit Daloze) via ruby-core
2025-01-28 22:12 ` [ruby-core:120814] " ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core
2025-01-29 9:34 ` [ruby-core:120820] " Eregon (Benoit Daloze) via ruby-core
2025-01-29 10:37 ` [ruby-core:120822] " Eregon (Benoit Daloze) via ruby-core
2025-01-29 10:39 ` [ruby-core:120823] " Eregon (Benoit Daloze) via ruby-core
2025-01-31 9:54 ` [ruby-core:120849] " Eregon (Benoit Daloze) via ruby-core
2025-02-14 5:12 ` [ruby-core:121026] " k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun) via ruby-core
2025-03-08 9:20 ` [ruby-core:121268] " nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga) via ruby-core
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=redmine.journal-111679.20250128213931.3344@ruby-lang.org \
--to=ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org \
--cc=noreply@ruby-lang.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).