From: "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@ruby-lang.org>
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:106512] [Ruby master Feature#18033] Time.new to parse a string
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 13:18:28 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-95171.20211206131828.4@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <redmine.issue-18033.20210709061300.4@ruby-lang.org>
Issue #18033 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) wrote in #note-19:
> First, the primary target is the result of `Time#inspect`, and it is not fully compliant with ISO-8601.
Thanks for making that clear, I wasn't sure why not just improve `Time.iso8601`.
Right, they differ:
```
irb(main):006:0> t.inspect
=> "2021-12-06 14:10:15.334531885 +0100"
irb(main):007:0> t.iso8601
=> "2021-12-06T14:10:15+01:00"
```
Why we do we need to parse `Time#inspect` output?
It seems in general bad to rely on `inspect` for serialization, since it only works for some classes.
Maybe to preserve subseconds?
`#inspect` does not feel like a proper way to serialize a Time instance, so if we want to add that I think we should have a new method for it too (maybe `#dump`?).
In any case, `Time.new` accepts individual time components, and I think making it parse strings is just confusing.
A new method `Time.try_convert` (or `Time.undump`) feels more appropriate for such parsing.
> Second, ISO-8601 allows many variants, but I'm not going to implement them all.
Is that what makes it faster?
The PR still uses a Regexp so I guess the main difference is the Regexp is a little bit simpler?
They look fairly similar:
* https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/4639/files
* https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/715a51a0d6963f9d727191d4e1ad0690fd28c4dd/lib/time.rb#L617-L650
----------------------------------------
Feature #18033: Time.new to parse a string
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18033#change-95171
* Author: nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Make `Time.new` parse `Time#inspect` and ISO-8601 like strings.
* `Time.iso8601` and `Time.parse` need an extension library, `date`.
* `Time.iso8601` can't parse `Time#inspect` string.
* `Time.parse` often results in unintentional/surprising results.
* `Time.new` also about 1.9 times faster than `Time.iso8601`.
```
$ ./ruby -rtime -rbenchmark -e '
n = 1000
s = Time.now.iso8601
Benchmark.bm(12) do |x|
x.report("Time.iso8601") {n.times{Time.iso8601(s)}}
x.report("Time.parse") {n.times{Time.parse(s)}}
x.report("Time.new") {n.times{Time.new(s)}}
end'
user system total real
Time.iso8601 0.006919 0.000185 0.007104 ( 0.007091)
Time.parse 0.018338 0.000207 0.018545 ( 0.018590)
Time.new 0.003671 0.000069 0.003740 ( 0.003741)
```
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/4639
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-06 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-09 6:13 [ruby-core:104552] " nobu
2021-07-09 6:30 ` [ruby-core:104554] " samuel
2021-07-09 7:51 ` [ruby-core:104559] " nobu
2021-07-09 8:29 ` [ruby-core:104562] " samuel
2021-07-09 8:51 ` [ruby-core:104564] " nobu
2021-07-10 8:42 ` [ruby-core:104575] " jean.boussier
2021-07-16 2:48 ` [ruby-core:104626] " samuel
2021-10-24 23:14 ` [ruby-core:105763] " ioquatix (Samuel Williams)
2021-11-10 10:44 ` [ruby-core:106002] " Eregon (Benoit Daloze)
2021-11-10 11:26 ` [ruby-core:106007] " byroot (Jean Boussier)
2021-11-12 11:33 ` [ruby-core:106036] " timcraft (Tim Craft)
2021-12-03 4:07 ` [ruby-core:106440] " nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
2021-12-03 6:54 ` [ruby-core:106443] " nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
2021-12-03 10:08 ` [ruby-core:106449] " sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)
2021-12-03 10:23 ` [ruby-core:106451] " sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)
2021-12-03 11:33 ` [ruby-core:106452] " Eregon (Benoit Daloze)
2021-12-03 13:21 ` [ruby-core:106456] " nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
2021-12-03 13:49 ` [ruby-core:106458] " nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
2021-12-06 4:55 ` [ruby-core:106501] " nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
2021-12-06 13:18 ` Eregon (Benoit Daloze) [this message]
2021-12-06 14:54 ` [ruby-core:106516] " nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
2021-12-06 17:37 ` [ruby-core:106521] " Eregon (Benoit Daloze)
2021-12-07 14:15 ` [ruby-core:106537] " nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
2022-12-15 6:11 ` [ruby-core:111293] " mame (Yusuke Endoh)
2022-12-15 6:54 ` [ruby-core:111295] " matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2024-10-11 12:49 ` [ruby-core:119511] " Eregon (Benoit Daloze) via ruby-core
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=redmine.journal-95171.20211206131828.4@ruby-lang.org \
--to=noreply@ruby-lang.org \
--cc=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).