From: "Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) via ruby-dev" <ruby-dev@ml.ruby-lang.org>
To: ruby-dev@ml.ruby-lang.org
Cc: "Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme)" <noreply@ruby-lang.org>
Subject: [ruby-dev:52107] [Ruby master Bug#20675] Parse error with required kwargs and omitted parens
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 12:52:28 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-109434.20240816125228.13@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <redmine.issue-20675.20240813021248.13@ruby-lang.org>
Issue #20675 has been updated by Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme).
> for `f k:<newline>val`, I found about 500 cases.
Thank you for searching. That's a lot more than I was able to find in my 950 sample gems, and with such a number I would vote to not change anything.
----------------------------------------
Bug #20675: Parse error with required kwargs and omitted parens
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20675#change-109434
* Author: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
* Status: Open
* Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
As pointed out in https://github.com/mruby/mruby/issues/6268, keyword arguments without surrounding parens are a bit confusing, e.g.
```ruby
def foo arg:
123
end
```
is parsed as
```ruby
def foo(arg:)
123
end
```
where
```ruby
k=25
f k:
10
```
is parserd as
```ruby
k=25
f(k: 10)
```
In summary, should we ignore newlines after keyword labels? Should we make them behave consistent?
Matz.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
_______________________________________________
ruby-dev mailing list -- ruby-dev@ml.ruby-lang.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-dev-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-16 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-13 2:12 [ruby-dev:52100] " matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) via ruby-dev
2024-08-13 13:19 ` [ruby-dev:52101] " bkuhlmann (Brooke Kuhlmann) via ruby-dev
2024-08-14 19:27 ` [ruby-dev:52102] " Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) via ruby-dev
2024-08-15 2:16 ` [ruby-dev:52103] " ko1 (Koichi Sasada) via ruby-dev
2024-08-15 16:04 ` [ruby-dev:52104] " Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) via ruby-dev
2024-08-15 22:12 ` [ruby-dev:52105] " jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) via ruby-dev
2024-08-16 8:43 ` [ruby-dev:52106] " ko1 (Koichi Sasada) via ruby-dev
2024-08-16 12:52 ` Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) via ruby-dev [this message]
2024-09-05 5:56 ` [ruby-dev:52111] " matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) via ruby-dev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=redmine.journal-109434.20240816125228.13@ruby-lang.org \
--to=ruby-dev@ml.ruby-lang.org \
--cc=noreply@ruby-lang.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).