ruby-dev (Japanese) list archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ruby-dev:50971] [Ruby master Bug#11213] defined?(super) ignores respond_to_missing?
       [not found] <redmine.issue-11213.20150602195939.17@ruby-lang.org>
@ 2020-11-17 12:20 ` nobu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: nobu @ 2020-11-17 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ruby-dev

Issue #11213 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada).


https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3777

----------------------------------------
Bug #11213: defined?(super) ignores respond_to_missing?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11213#change-88543

* Author: ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
* ruby -v: 2.3dev
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
```ruby
class C0
  def method_missing *args
    p [:method_missing] + args
  end
  def respond_to_missing? *args
    true
  end
end

class C1 < C0
  def foo
    super
    defined?(super)
  end
end

p C1.new.foo
```

This script prints

```
[:method_missing, :foo]
nil
```

In this case, we can call super, but defined? returns nil.
It should be a bug.




-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-11-17 12:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <redmine.issue-11213.20150602195939.17@ruby-lang.org>
2020-11-17 12:20 ` [ruby-dev:50971] [Ruby master Bug#11213] defined?(super) ignores respond_to_missing? nobu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).