From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp6.jps.net ([216.119.0.86]) by hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu with SMTP id <25423>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 18:34:20 -0400 Received: from pkwksj.sjna.corp.dom (209-239-201-230.oak.jps.net [209.239.201.230]) by smtp6.jps.net (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id RAA06831; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:11:51 -0800 (PST) From: "kim kubik" To: "kim kubik" , , "sam Fans" Subject: Re: the obvious. =) (to everyone but kim) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 20:12:53 -0500 Message-ID: <01bf9aae$3d654fe0$e6c9efd1@pkwksj.sjna.corp.dom> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 -----Original Message----- From: James A. Robinson To: kim kubik Date: Monday, March 27, 2000 2:55 PM Subject: Re: the obvious. =) (to everyone but kim) (kim wrote): >> PS: Jim I also have a number of SREs that walk through a file and >> delete those little copywrite notices and things like that which >> you Elsevier people seem to be so keen on including. :-) (and Jim replied): > Elsevier??? What gave you the idea I was an Elsevier person? > I work for HighWire Press, Elsevier is the antithesis of us. > > Jim Ooops, guess I stuck my foot in it again! Sorry if there are any implications I'm unaware of vis-a-vis Highwire & Elsevier, like maybe Elsevier publishes only to the pederast trade, while Highwire has loftier aspirations. On a safer topic the re you gave for bolding dot in an html file just needed a tiny addition to work in (I think, a dubious activity at best and not equating to 'I am') that s/(.+\n*)*/&<\/b>/ will surround any amount of backhilited text with ..., not just text on one line, and the text may include blank lines. So thank you and sorry about the faux pas. - kim