From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from burdell.cc.gatech.edu ([130.207.3.207]) by hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu with SMTP id <24109>; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 11:29:33 -0500
Received: from penfold.cc.gatech.edu (penfold.cc.gatech.edu [130.207.3.249]) by burdell.cc.gatech.edu (8.6.4/8.6.4) with ESMTP id LAA13365; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 11:29:15 -0500
Received: from localhost (arnold@localhost) by penfold.cc.gatech.edu (8.6.4/8.6.4) id LAA05255; Wed, 26 Jan 1994 11:29:12 -0500
From:	arnold@cc.gatech.edu (Arnold Robbins)
Message-Id: <199401261629.LAA05255@penfold.cc.gatech.edu>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jan 1994 11:29:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: Pete Fenelon's 34-line message on Jan 26,  4:05pm
X-Ultrix: Just Say NO!
X-Important-Saying: Premature Optimization Is The Root Of All Evil.
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To:	pete@minster.york.ac.uk (Pete Fenelon),
	arnold@cc.gatech.edu (Arnold Robbins)
Subject: Re: yet another creeping feature suggestion
Cc:	sam-fans@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu

> What's wrong with opening up a separate window with your favourite Sam commands
> in and using snarf/paste to execute them in the command window?

Absolutely nothing.  I didn't think of it.  Of course, I didn't put a whole
lot of effort into it either. :-)

> Some of the samkeys patches also take care of parts of what you're after (at 
> least sending things to the command window).

I'll take a harder look at samkeys.  It seemed a little to bell&whistle for
me (personal opinion, no criticsms implied).  About all it has that I sort of
miss is auto-indent, and I find myself not missing it as much as I do in
vi.

Thanks all.