From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from repop2.jps.net ([209.63.224.239]) by hawkwind.utcs.utoronto.ca with SMTP id <24881>; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 15:45:23 -0500 Received: from 6625hvt3r227 (209-239-201-39.oak.jps.net [209.239.201.39]) by repop2.jps.net (8.9.0/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA12011; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 10:47:29 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199901211847.KAA12011@repop2.jps.net> From: "Chaotrope" To: "Michael D. Scheer" , Subject: Re: sam on win32 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 13:39:52 -0500 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On: Wednesday, January 20, 1999: ---------- > From: Michael D. Scheer > To: sam-fans@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu > Subject: sam on win32 > What is the current state of efforts to get sam onto win32? seanq's > port does not seem to have been updated in a while. I don't understand the 'problem' - I use the seanq version in a Win95 system with no problem (alright, it will hang sometimes, but I blame that on B. Gates) so why would it need updating? I'm so happy with sam that I've even thought of buying my own i386 clone system (work pays for what I currently use) just to run the Linux p9 "emulation" (ie, sam, wily, rc/es, 9term,9wm), even tho I swore years back that I wouldn't spend my own money on computer junk any more - too much stuff collecting in closets. - kim BTW did you notice that 'rc' is in the /bin? Nice undocumented treat.