From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from highwire.stanford.edu ([171.64.249.40]) by hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu with SMTP id <26299>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 18:20:38 -0500
Received: from aubrey.stanford.edu (jimr@aubrey.Stanford.EDU [171.64.31.58])
        by highwire.stanford.edu (8.9.3/HIGHWIRE2.0) with ESMTP id KAA18140;
	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:28:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200003281828.KAA18140@highwire.stanford.edu>
X-url: http://highwire.stanford.edu/~jimr/
X-face: "!ZH^<"U,NeU:732A<C4y,*Cf?(iP<kPeb6%sXHk7p\H;56mY2n|J?=#=d0*O=8%G:xc2.f
 @r{2w5^o|Kn_v*t|P68T[9c-c=k90RX}Jht/v
Reply-to: jim.robinson@stanford.edu
From:	"James A. Robinson" <jim.robinson@stanford.edu>
To:	Jim Crigler <criglerj@yahoo.com>
cc:	sam-fans@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu
Dcc: 
Subject: Re: sam-9libs vs. Linux (RH 6.0) 
In-reply-to: Message from Jim Crigler <criglerj@yahoo.com> 
   of "Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:15:41 PST."References: <20000328181541.26330.qmail@web3203.mail.yahoo.com> 
 <20000328181541.26330.qmail@web3203.mail.yahoo.com> 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <19312.954268136.1@aubrey.stanford.edu>
Date:	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 13:28:56 -0500
Sender: jimr@aubrey.stanford.edu

> 16-bit X works, thanks.  Neither 24 nor 32 works,
> however.  Is this likely to be a libXg problem or
> something in samterm per se?

I seem to recall it was a libXg problem. Someone explained that part of
the code expects the depth to be have some properties that don't apply
to 24bit depth (or, I guess, 32bit). I'm sorry that I don't remember
the details.

Jim