From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com ([204.94.214.22]) by hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu with SMTP id <25768>; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:25:43 -0400 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id PAA05557; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:39:56 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (pj@sam.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sam.engr.sgi.com (sam.engr.sgi.com [163.154.6.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA78804; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:35:42 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (pj@sam.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from pj@localhost) by sam.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA76725; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 18:34:41 -0400 From: pj@sam.engr.sgi.com (Paul Jackson) Message-Id: <200004262234.PAA76725@sam.engr.sgi.com> To: sam-fans@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu, "rob pike" Subject: Re: Samx - one more time ... |> Around here, we spend most of our time avoiding adding |> sam features. it's already pretty damn good. |> But we did add one recently: Redo. excellent |> but if someone is interested in doing the work I will If I am able to free up a block of time, and if Bengt is willing to pick up the merge (this would be pure 'sam', no samx or whatever I'm doing), then I'd like to do that. But I can't right now. If I did that for the public sam fans, then I would feel better about using this code base for my own endeavors - which tend to blend Rick Davis's zip (jot) with sam, focused on X11. If someone else gets there first - more power to them. ======================================================================= I won't rest till it's the best ... Software Production Engineer Paul Jackson (pj@sgi.com; pj@usa.net) 3x1373 http://sam.engr.sgi.com/pj