From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from netcomsv.netcom.com ([192.100.81.101]) by hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu with SMTP id <2808>; Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:21:34 -0500 Received: from netapp.UUCP by netcomsv.netcom.com with UUCP (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA14220; Mon, 23 Nov 92 19:17:02 PST Received: by netapp.netapp.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA07803; Mon, 23 Nov 92 19:19:58 PST Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:19:58 -0500 From: byron@netapp.com (Byron Rakitzis) Message-Id: <9211240319.AA07803@netapp.netapp.com> To: john@civil.su.oz.au, sam-fans@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu Subject: Re: saved replacement texts? >This suggestion, I am afraid, is just plain stupid, emacs or no. Oh, come off your high-horse. Emacs has a command-line which is separate from the current window. Obviously Scott was not talking about replacing the command window with the new file. >Pike did an excellent job designing the sam interface. I agree. But I don't think he achieved perfection, nor do I think that suggestions for improvement are inappropriate. >The single click to place the usual edit window is just what you want. I'm sorry, maybe it's what you want, but it's not what I want. >Sometimes, you want to put the command window in the middle of the top-level >window, and have edit windows above and below. Yes, about 1% of the time. Does it make sense to have the user interface revolve around this remote possibility? >It's not broken and doesn't need any fixing. Obviously a matter of opinion. I would prefer either of two options: 1) automatic placement 2) non-placement, i.e., leaving the files in the menu with a minus-sign. (this makes opening the file into a two-click operation, assuming that sam points the "lasthit" of the menu at the newly opened file) In both cases, it means that I don't have to automatically reach for the mouse after typing B. (though I prefer solution #1) For example, I often want to make a quick change to a file with commands of the form B file cmd D at *least* as often as I want to tile or otherwise futz with the sam layers.