From: Alan Watson <alan@oldp.astro.wisc.edu>
To: sam-fans@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu
Subject: Re: Lines and last lines.
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1992 14:27:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9212011928.AA21580@oldp.astro.wisc.edu> (raw)
Several points.
Yes, I should have said that the undefined semantics of a final line
without a newline went somewhat against sam's philosophy that files
are arbitrary streams of TEXT.
The default for x is more subtle that I at first supposed, and is
useful not just when the final line of the FILE is not terminated by a
newline, but also when the final line of the RANGE is a partial line.
As to the behaviour of "x /RE/", clearly I misread the somewhat
contradictory documentation. The sam paper states on page 6 that
"blanks in these examples are to improve readability; sam neither
requires nor interprets them." The sam tutorial states on page 11 "if
x is followed immediately by a space, the pattern .*\n is assumed."
The man page states on page 5 that "if the regular expression and its
slashes are omitted /*.\n/ is assumed." Is putting a space between
the x and the RE really an omission of the RE? Apparently it is.
I don't like white-space to have sematic content (other than to serve
as a separator and terminator). While I like the default for
x ...
I think I might have prefered
x /RE/...
to be equivalent to
x/RE/...
but I guess one might argue that the difference is needed to
disambiguate
x/RE/ ...
and
x /RE/...
although the latter could have been written without ambiguity as
x {
/RE/...
}
Can anyone think of a situation where one might want to use "x /RE/..."?
Many a time I too have blessed emacs for allowing me to edit binary
files. Howevere, all is not lost with sam, due to it's superbly
flexible shell escapes. All one needs a filter which takes a binary
file and writes out octal, and vice verse; one then uses ",<" and ",>"
to read an write binary, whilst editing the octal representation.
Alan.
next reply other threads:[~1992-12-01 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1992-12-01 19:27 Alan Watson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1992-12-01 19:54 Byron Rakitzis
1992-12-01 7:57 Byron Rakitzis
1992-12-01 7:11 Michael John Haertel
1992-12-01 7:01 Alan Watson
1992-12-01 5:08 Byron Rakitzis
1992-12-01 0:40 Alan Watson
1992-12-01 5:46 ` Chris Siebenmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9212011928.AA21580@oldp.astro.wisc.edu \
--to=alan@oldp.astro.wisc.edu \
--cc=sam-fans@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).