From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from groucho.cs.psu.edu ([130.203.2.10]) by hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu with SMTP id <2706>; Wed, 26 May 1993 20:21:52 -0400
Received: from localhost by groucho.cs.psu.edu with SMTP id <2620>; Wed, 26 May 1993 20:20:13 -0400
To:	Sam Fans <sam-fans@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu>
Subject: Re: quit with modified files 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 May 1993 19:07:35 EDT."
             <93May25.190741edt.2688@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu> 
Date:	Wed, 26 May 1993 20:21:12 -0400
From:	Scott Schwartz <schwartz@groucho.cs.psu.edu>
Message-Id: <93May26.202013edt.2620@groucho.cs.psu.edu>

Thanks for the patch Chris.  But now I have a second question. :-)
Consider this:

	; sam/sam -d                 
	B /etc/fstab
	 -. /etc/fstab
	i
	foo
	.
	D /etc/fstab
	?changes to "/etc/fstab"
	B /etc/svdtab
	 -. /etc/svdtab
	D /etc/fstab
	q

In other words, the second close attempt on a file will always succeed,
even if other operations have taken place in the meantime.  That seems
rather aggressive to me; when the man page talks about a ``subsequent
D'', I expected that it meant an immediately subsequent one.