From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from relay3.UU.NET ([192.48.96.8]) by hawkwind.utcs.utoronto.ca with SMTP id <24088>; Wed, 17 Aug 1994 10:43:18 -0400
Received: from uucp7.UU.NET by relay3.UU.NET with SMTP 
	id QQxdiw13886; Wed, 17 Aug 1994 10:42:59 -0400
Received: from rexago8.UUCP by uucp7.UU.NET with UUCP/RMAIL
        ; Wed, 17 Aug 1994 10:43:01 -0400
Received: by summitis.com (smail2.5)
	id AA22308; 17 Aug 94 09:01:37 EDT (Wed)
Received: from summitis.com by rserv1.summitis.com; Wed, 17 Aug 1994 09:00 EDT
Received: from cheetah by rexsrvr2.summitis.com (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA86628; Wed, 17 Aug 1994 09:02:33 -0400
Received: by cheetah (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA21593; Wed, 17 Aug 1994 09:02:31 -0400
From:	hc05@summitis.com
Message-Id: <9408171302.AA21593@cheetah>
Subject: samx2 and sam 3/12/93
To:	sam-fans@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu (Sam mailing list)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date:	Wed, 17 Aug 1994 10:43:08 -0400

I have been happily using sam with the samx2 extensions.  One problem,
though, keeps me from recommending it to others.  It dies periodically,
scaring off the fainthearted.  I have the October 1993 version of sam,
which the patches don't support, and with good reason since they
produce 4 reject files in libXg.  My question is can I get the 3/12/93
version of sam anywhere, or has anyone reconciled samx2 with the
October version of sam?

Beirne

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beirne Konarski                 | Reading maketh a full man, conference a
beirnek@summitis.com            | ready man, and writing an exact man.
"Untouched by Scandal"          |       -- Francis Bacon
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------