From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from ben.britain.eu.net ([192.91.199.254]) by hawkwind.utcs.utoronto.ca with SMTP id <24182>; Mon, 31 Oct 1994 10:54:28 -0500
Received: from cegelecproj.co.uk by ben.britain.eu.net via PSS with NIFTP (PP) 
          id <g.07243-0@ben.britain.eu.net>; Mon, 31 Oct 1994 15:42:23 +0000
Received: from zombie.gec-epl.co.uk (zombie.limbo.gec-epl.co.uk) 
          by vampire.gec-epl.co.uk (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA15652;
          Mon, 31 Oct 1994 15:47:15 +0000
Received: by zombie.gec-epl.co.uk (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA24660;
          Mon, 31 Oct 1994 15:39:29 +0000
Date:	Mon, 31 Oct 1994 10:39:29 -0500
From:	steve@cegelecproj.co.uk (Steve_Kilbane)
Message-Id: <9410311539.AA24660@zombie.gec-epl.co.uk>
To:	sam-fans@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu
Subject: 9term and shells
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
X-Face: Iqsa(US9p?)Y^W+6Ff[Z]<t?\A!eaL'DG{20*#{C1;'Ct&}L}B^/1(aYI@hP)4!<}7D=2gm 
        8!$T`8QNfK<te\20%A\`wm*wa2"^Up*Qs"X}KeV*3XeB2te&sKp*t`N;^BDh[6=K{ZBE=O>rM"uFE) 
        lFDjag1e]\/#2

Just out of curiosity, does everyone who uses 9term use either rc or es as
their shell, or do some people use the more baroque shells? It just seems
to me that 9term's mode of interaction would discourage people who liked
such shells...

steve