From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from nexus.yorku.ca ([130.63.9.66]) by hawkwind.utcs.utoronto.ca with SMTP id <24130>; Sun, 18 Sep 1994 23:37:43 -0400
Received: by nexus.yorku.ca id <9224>; Sun, 18 Sep 1994 23:37:33 -0400
From:	"ozan s. yigit" <oz@nexus.yorku.ca>
To:	sam-fans@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu
Subject: Re: (click) undo
Message-Id: <94Sep18.233733edt.9224@nexus.yorku.ca>
Date:	Sun, 18 Sep 1994 23:37:22 -0400

indeed, i undo with some frequency, and a good  portion of those undoes
are necessiated outside the sam window, which means going back and forth
between the sam window and the current window. i cannot however use my own
odd editing activities as a basis good design, and i also think that there
may be more than one design issue involved here. i still wonder what other
sam-fans think. what is the typical undo activity of an average sam user?

on a related topic: undo is also omitted from the protocol, which
of course reflects the needs of the current samterm. a more general
protocol would probably include it.

oz