From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from emory.mathcs.emory.edu ([128.140.2.1]) by hawkwind.utcs.utoronto.ca with SMTP id <24004>; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 01:45:23 -0500
Received: from skeeve.UUCP by
	emory.mathcs.emory.edu (5.65/Emory_mathcs.4.0.11) via UUCP
	id AA01336 ; Thu, 19 Jan 95 01:45:11 -0500
Return-Path: arnold@skeeve.atl.ga.us
Received: by skeeve.atl.ga.us (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.1)
	id <m0rUn8f-00013yC@skeeve.atl.ga.us>; Wed, 18 Jan 95 22:02 EST
Message-Id: <m0rUn8f-00013yC@skeeve.atl.ga.us>
From:	arnold@skeeve.atl.ga.us
Date:	Wed, 18 Jan 1995 22:02:21 -0500
X-Ultrix: Just Say NO!
X-Important-Saying: Premature Optimization Is The Root Of All Evil.
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To:	sam-fans@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu
Subject: X11R6?

Greetings.  I've been wondering if X11R6 has enough new stuff / performance
enhancements to be worth the switch?  I have a Sun IPC (low end sparc) at
home with X11R5 fully patched (NOT OpenWindoze), and the performance is OK.

Is R6 worth the trouble to get, compile overnight, rebuild sam/9term/9wm,
and in general switch?  I have the latest gcc, if that makes a difference
in the performance.

Thanks,

Arnold