* Re: 9term and shells
@ 1994-10-31 16:16 pete
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: pete @ 1994-10-31 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sam-fans, steve
rc -- on the basis that it's the only shell I use in _any_ Unix environment
if at all possible!
The only other shell that would really make sense in a 9term would be the
Bourne shell; I can't see {t}csh, bash or [kz]sh being worthwhile under
9term as it doesn't provide the sort of terminal emulation they want for all
their fancy completion/editing facilities.
(incidentally, has anyone got a _good_ port of 9term to Linux? -- I did a
DIY one which gets very confused occasionally...)
pete
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* 9term and shells
@ 1994-10-31 15:39 Steve_Kilbane
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steve_Kilbane @ 1994-10-31 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sam-fans
Just out of curiosity, does everyone who uses 9term use either rc or es as
their shell, or do some people use the more baroque shells? It just seems
to me that 9term's mode of interaction would discourage people who liked
such shells...
steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1994-10-31 16:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1994-10-31 16:16 9term and shells pete
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1994-10-31 15:39 Steve_Kilbane
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).