From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1519 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Radek Podgorny" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: runit not collecting zombies Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:31:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <14169.9655833238$1189693894@news.gmane.org> References: <20070716000927.GY23517@home.power> <47939.::ffff:77.75.72.5.1189601606.squirrel@mail.podgorny.cz> <20070912143557.GC12043@home.power> <20070912150047.GD12043@home.power> <35517.::ffff:77.75.72.5.1189613042.squirrel@mail.podgorny.cz> <20070912170450.GE12043@home.power> <50411.::ffff:77.75.72.5.1189673890.squirrel@mail.podgorny.cz> <20070913105731.GL12043@home.power> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189693894 28732 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2007 14:31:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:31:34 +0000 (UTC) To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Original-X-From: supervision-return-1754-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Thu Sep 13 16:31:31 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IVpij-0002gl-SY for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:31:05 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 11848 invoked by uid 76); 13 Sep 2007 14:31:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 11838 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2007 14:31:26 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20070913105731.GL12043@home.power> User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:1519 Archived-At: > Hi! > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:58:10AM +0200, Radek Podgorny wrote: >> * I don't use hardened at all so I think this is not to be blamed. >> * It is not a 2.6.20 kernel bug as I experience this on 2.6.19.1 and >> even >> something like 2.6.18 (can't look right now). > > I got this issue first time on 2.6.16 (hardened packages released with > some delay). So, it's 2.6.16.19. > >> * All my kernels are vanilla. >> * The only two systems that run fine may be fucked up, too. One of them >> is >> a laptop so the uptime may be too short to notice. The other one has >> uptime of something like 160 days so it may screw up on next reboot. > > Hmm. Can you reboot that system with 160 days update, just to be sure it > is have sense this compare it to other systems? I must admit I'm affraid to reboot the system. At least I have one running machine... :-( >> What about CFLAGS? I'll get them from my machines and post them. I >> suspect >> they are mostly -O3 and arch set to specific processor (not generic i686 >> or so)... > > Hardened insists on very stable CFLAGS. > My servers/workstation: > CFLAGS="-march=pentium-m -O2 -pipe" > CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe" > CFLAGS="-march=k8 -O2 -pipe -fforce-addr" > Server without zombie issue: > CFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O2 -pipe -ftracer -fprefetch-loop-arrays" Hmmm, so this looks like CFLAGS are out, too... >> Maybe it's some kind of time overflow bug, can you find when did you >> start >> experiencing the trouble? > > Time overflow? In 2-10 days? Don't think so. I meant a "global" time overflow (not relative to bootup). Something like unix timestamp 32b overflow kind of thing... > Important question: do you recompile overall system after upgrading any of > toolchain packages (linux-headers/glibc/gcc/binutils)? I see you're using > newer gcc (4.x.x), but do you recompiled everything with it? No I don't. I just upgrade the compiler and as the packages are to be upgraded, the new compiler is used. So the system is compiled with different versions. Do you recompile the entire system? > P.S. I think it's time to try sysvinit for me. Looking forward to see the results... > > -- > WBR, Alex. > >