From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/2877 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Jeff Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: runit SIGPWR support Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:45:25 +0100 Message-ID: <16493951581950725@iva5-be053096037b.qloud-c.yandex.net> References: <1beb6e35-d4be-60b8-fc52-af666c4fffe3@gmx.com> <20200212215427.GG12551@cathexis.xen.prgmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="43732"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Original-X-From: supervision-return-2466-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane-mx.org@list.skarnet.org Mon Feb 17 15:45:31 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from alyss.skarnet.org ([95.142.172.232]) by ciao.gmane.io with smtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j3heN-000BH6-7u for gcsg-supervision@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:45:31 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 8044 invoked by uid 89); 17 Feb 2020 14:45:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm Original-Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Original-Received: (qmail 8037 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2020 14:45:57 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1581950726; bh=Bv28rlvJff2qrAD6nU/h3cl1ztPtXFj1hnD/yo4K0BQ=; h=References:Date:Message-Id:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=knms52Sycj9oHWw9B47+CLQ8XuAG12eebP+Vow+Oxs+6YRhB/ZTGPfKthsghg9kW8 CkGkMa8hSIWUpDh1z7PyqunPc1MhxaLFgg9l6qYyPM57w/oqFfIwyCWS1mKxIBzvI0 lw4ssKTkDZFMgoBebvFX+fjJvW41D6rK5I7m+AVI= Authentication-Results: mxback4g.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com In-Reply-To: <20200212215427.GG12551@cathexis.xen.prgmr.com> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:2877 Archived-At: 12.02.2020, 22:54, "Colin Booth" : > far as I know SIGPWR is a Linux-specific signal so services that are > aiming for portability will either need to have special handling for > that in the linux case or need to ignore it. Ergo, runit (and all other > POSIX-compliant inits) currently have no special handling around SIGPWR > as they don't understand what it is. what about SIGINT and SIGWINCH ? are they required by the POSIX standard ? if not why does runit handle both ?