From: Mathieu Poumeyrol <kali@zoy.org>
To: Mathieu Poumeyrol <kali@zoy.org>
Cc: Charlie Brady <charlieb-supervision@budge.apana.org.au>,
supervision@list.skarnet.org
Subject: Re: Bug for sv status in lsb mode
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:18:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17A739BC-94BA-4611-A523-6978934F0D61@zoy.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94175859-2733-4ACF-85E9-DD5FF627F23B@zoy.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 993 bytes --]
Le 13 juil. 09 à 16:13, Mathieu Poumeyrol a écrit :
>
> Le 13 juil. 09 à 15:42, Charlie Brady a écrit :
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Mathieu Poumeyrol wrote:
>>
>>> I have tracked down a bug in the lsb-compatible code for sv
>>> status: sv return 0 even if the service is down.
>>
>> What makes you think that sv status should return non-zero if the
>> service is down? I see nothing to suggest that here:
>>
>> http://smarden.sunsite.dk/runit/sv.8.html
>
>
> It's not explicit here, but required for LSB compliance.
>
> see http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/iniscrptact.html
>
> As a matter of fact, sv code looks like it is meant to achieve this,
> but fails because of the side effect on the "r" global.
Sorry, it is actually explicit in the "Exit codes" last paragraph...
If the command is status, it exits 3 if the service is down, and 4 if
the status is unknown. It exits 2 on wrong usage, and 151 on error.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-13 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-13 8:00 Mathieu Poumeyrol
2009-07-13 13:42 ` Charlie Brady
2009-07-13 14:13 ` Mathieu Poumeyrol
2009-07-13 14:18 ` Mathieu Poumeyrol [this message]
2009-07-13 14:20 ` Charlie Brady
2009-07-17 9:08 ` Gerrit Pape
2009-07-17 10:02 ` Mathieu Poumeyrol
2009-07-17 11:08 ` Gerrit Pape
2009-07-19 14:52 ` sv sometimes won't issue down request Earl Chew
2009-07-19 17:14 ` svwaitup races with sv Earl Chew
2009-07-24 20:31 ` Charlie Brady
2009-07-24 20:35 ` Earl Chew
2009-07-24 20:18 ` sv sometimes won't issue down request (specifically, after 'sv once xxx') Charlie Brady
2009-07-24 20:38 ` Earl Chew
2009-07-24 21:01 ` Charlie Brady
2009-07-25 19:49 ` Joan Picanyol i Puig
2009-07-27 9:09 ` sv sometimes won't issue down request Gerrit Pape
2009-07-27 17:39 ` Earl Chew
2010-05-31 19:54 ` Bug for sv status in lsb mode Erik Wright
2010-06-03 9:04 ` Gerrit Pape
2010-06-03 14:12 ` Erik Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17A739BC-94BA-4611-A523-6978934F0D61@zoy.org \
--to=kali@zoy.org \
--cc=charlieb-supervision@budge.apana.org.au \
--cc=supervision@list.skarnet.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).