Le 13 juil. 09 à 16:13, Mathieu Poumeyrol a écrit :
>
> Le 13 juil. 09 à 15:42, Charlie Brady a écrit :
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Mathieu Poumeyrol wrote:
>>
>>> I have tracked down a bug in the lsb-compatible code for sv  
>>> status:  sv return 0 even if the service is down.
>>
>> What makes you think that sv status should return non-zero if the  
>> service is down? I see nothing to suggest that here:
>>
>> http://smarden.sunsite.dk/runit/sv.8.html
>
>
> It's not explicit here, but required for LSB compliance.
>
> see http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/iniscrptact.html
>
> As a matter of fact, sv code looks like it is meant to achieve this,  
> but fails because of the side effect on the "r" global.

Sorry, it is actually explicit in the "Exit codes" last paragraph...

If the command is status, it exits 3 if the service is down, and 4 if  
the status is unknown. It exits 2 on wrong usage, and 151 on error.