supervision - discussion about system services, daemon supervision, init, runlevel management, and tools such as s6 and runit
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Schwinge <schwinge-lists-skarnet.org-supervision@nic-nac-project.de>
Cc: supervision@list.skarnet.org
Subject: Re: Who actually gets the TERM signal in "runsvctrl down"?
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 10:17:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040626081735.GA16250@speedy.schwinge.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3pt7n9d9v.fsf@asfast.com>

On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 12:03:02AM -0400, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
> Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com> writes:
> 
> > [ ... ]
> >
> >   restart:   runscvtrl t apache; runsvctrl u apache
> >   (causes cleanup stuff to run during the second command)
> 
> We both suggested this one, but I have a question:
> 
> Why do we need the second "u" command?  Won't the "run" script restart
> on its own after the "t" command, thereby obviating the need for the "u"
> command?

It'll do so if apache was running before.
If it was not running it will just be started.

> In this case, the cleanup stuff in the script will get
> re-invoked on restart, correct?

Yes.


Regards,
 Thomas


  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-26  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-25 14:01 Lloyd Zusman
2004-06-25 15:33 ` Charlie Brady
2004-06-25 16:03   ` Lloyd Zusman
2004-06-25 16:11     ` Charlie Brady
2004-06-25 16:36       ` Lloyd Zusman
2004-06-25 17:15         ` Paul Jarc
2004-06-26  0:26           ` Scott Gifford
2004-06-26  1:39           ` Lloyd Zusman
2004-06-26  2:17             ` Charlie Brady
2004-06-26  2:44               ` Lloyd Zusman
2004-06-26  3:01                 ` Lloyd Zusman
2004-06-26  4:03                   ` Lloyd Zusman
2004-06-26  8:17                     ` Thomas Schwinge [this message]
2004-06-26 15:45                     ` Charlie Brady
2004-06-25 18:27         ` Charlie Brady
2004-06-25 19:13           ` Lloyd Zusman
2004-06-25 19:48             ` Charlie Brady
2004-06-26  3:49             ` Paul Jarc
2004-06-26 21:10               ` Lloyd Zusman
2004-06-25 18:40     ` Jim Zajkowski
2004-06-25 16:13   ` Dean Hall
2004-06-25 16:17     ` Charlie Brady

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040626081735.GA16250@speedy.schwinge.homeip.net \
    --to=schwinge-lists-skarnet.org-supervision@nic-nac-project.de \
    --cc=supervision@list.skarnet.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).