From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/494
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Schwinge <schwinge-lists-skarnet.org-supervision@nic-nac-project.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general
Subject: Re: Who actually gets the TERM signal in "runsvctrl down"?
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 10:17:35 +0200
Message-ID: <20040626081735.GA16250@speedy.schwinge.homeip.net>
References: <m3brj7f67z.fsf@asfast.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0406252150440.2967-100000@e-smith.charlieb.ott.istop.com> <m3d63ndon7.fsf@asfast.com> <m3k6xvaupy.fsf@asfast.com> <m3pt7n9d9v.fsf@asfast.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1088238055 7442 80.91.224.253 (26 Jun 2004 08:20:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 08:20:55 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: supervision@list.skarnet.org
Original-X-From: supervision-return-732-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Sat Jun 26 10:20:46 2004
Return-path: <supervision-return-732-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org>
Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14])
	by deer.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Be8QY-0006zj-00
	for <gcsg-supervision@gmane.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 10:20:46 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 19290 invoked by uid 76); 26 Jun 2004 08:21:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm
List-Post: <mailto:supervision@list.skarnet.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supervision-help@list.skarnet.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:supervision-unsubscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:supervision-subscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Archive: <http://www.skarnet.org/lists/>
Original-Received: (qmail 19284 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2004 08:21:07 -0000
Original-To: Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com>,
	supervision@list.skarnet.org
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3pt7n9d9v.fsf@asfast.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:494
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:494

On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 12:03:02AM -0400, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
> Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com> writes:
> 
> > [ ... ]
> >
> >   restart:   runscvtrl t apache; runsvctrl u apache
> >   (causes cleanup stuff to run during the second command)
> 
> We both suggested this one, but I have a question:
> 
> Why do we need the second "u" command?  Won't the "run" script restart
> on its own after the "t" command, thereby obviating the need for the "u"
> command?

It'll do so if apache was running before.
If it was not running it will just be started.

> In this case, the cleanup stuff in the script will get
> re-invoked on restart, correct?

Yes.


Regards,
 Thomas