From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/582
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general
Subject: Re: Nested runsvdir
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:02:40 +0000
Message-ID: <20040919200236.28026.qmail@32044832572666.315fe32.mid.smarden.org>
References: <873c1i2fip.wl@badger.wordzoo.com> <20040917024546.GD11101@tinyvaio.nome.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1095624145 12952 80.91.229.6 (19 Sep 2004 20:02:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:02:25 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Jared Rhine <jared@wordzoo.com>
Original-X-From: supervision-return-821-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Sun Sep 19 22:02:14 2004
Return-path: <supervision-return-821-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org>
Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14] ident=qmailr)
	by deer.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1C97t0-0003c9-00
	for <gcsg-supervision@gmane.org>; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:02:14 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 21798 invoked by uid 76); 19 Sep 2004 20:02:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm
List-Post: <mailto:supervision@list.skarnet.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supervision-help@list.skarnet.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:supervision-unsubscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:supervision-subscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Archive: <http://www.skarnet.org/lists/>
Original-Received: (qmail 21793 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2004 20:02:36 -0000
Original-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org
Mail-Followup-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org,
	Jared Rhine <jared@wordzoo.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040917024546.GD11101@tinyvaio.nome.ca>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:582
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:582

On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:45:49AM +0900, mike@mikebell.org wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 12:13:50PM -0700, Jared Rhine wrote:
> > Are there any known caveats to "nesting" runsvdir instances?  I'm
> > having problems with signals and processes reparenting to init.
> 
> Yeah, I also have these problems. Worked around by bringing down
> the child runsvdir's stuff in stage 3 before bringing down the parent,
> but there are still a few issues.

Would you mind to tell us which ones?

Thanks, Gerrit.