From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/685 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Csillag =?iso-8859-2?Q?Tam=E1s?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: runit running under linux 2.4 with openwall patches Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 01:44:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20050126004448.GI10265@digitus> References: <20050121193151.5581.qmail@f99cf6af5269a6.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <1106650731.41f6266bcbe61@www.wolfpuppy.org.uk> <84B8E07C-6F29-11D9-9341-000A9598BFB2@annvix.org> Reply-To: Csillag =?iso-8859-2?Q?Tam=E1s?= NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1106700299 4898 80.91.229.6 (26 Jan 2005 00:44:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: supervision-return-924-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Wed Jan 26 01:44:52 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by deer.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CtbIi-0003zN-00 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 01:44:52 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 30343 invoked by uid 76); 26 Jan 2005 00:45:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 30337 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2005 00:45:12 -0000 Original-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <84B8E07C-6F29-11D9-9341-000A9598BFB2@annvix.org> X-Operating-System: Gnu/Linux X-PPKE-NOSPAM: I promise, I will never let anything happen to you. Nemo. X-PGP-Key: http://digitus.itk.ppke.hu/~cstamas/cstamas.pgp User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-PPKE-ITK-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-PPKE-ITK-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (pont=-13.081, szukseges 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -3.30, AWL 2.82, BAYES_00 -2.60, LOCAL_PPKE -10.00) X-PPKE-ITK-MailScanner-From: cstamas@digitus.itk.ppke.hu Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:685 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:685 Hi On 01/25, Vincent Danen wrote: > > On Jan 25, 2005, at 3:58, Torne Wuff wrote: ... > >Yes, it's dietlibc. Dietlibc executes code from the stack during > >system calls, > >afaict. > > Well, it's definitely dietlibc. I compiled runit with glibc > (statically) and it works just fine. Very strange. I got the same with grsecurity (www.grsecurity.org). Well it did not stated exactly in the log that the stack operation is the cause of killing that process. It could happen for *all* dietlibc linked program. (I experienced in: runsv svlogd fnord tcpsvd ... ) In grsec I use the chpax utility to bypass this security checks on these (and only these) programs. Maybe it is worth asking the author of dietlibc.. http://www.fefe.de/dietlibc/ -- cstamas