From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/747 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gerrit Pape Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: runit running under linux 2.4 with openwall patches Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:40:14 +0000 Message-ID: <20050314173847.20768.qmail@148ccc554c548c.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> References: <20050121193151.5581.qmail@f99cf6af5269a6.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <1106650731.41f6266bcbe61@www.wolfpuppy.org.uk> <84B8E07C-6F29-11D9-9341-000A9598BFB2@annvix.org> <20050126004448.GI10265@digitus> <31302029-6F53-11D9-9341-000A9598BFB2@annvix.org> <20050205212555.GI20427@digitus> <86f55940a26d28d7a6a3a131c9947f5b@annvix.org> <20050314141146.GJ14286@digitus> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1110823033 20841 80.91.229.2 (14 Mar 2005 17:57:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: supervision-return-983-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Mon Mar 14 18:57:13 2005 Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14] ident=qmailr) by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DAtVM-0005Ks-1e for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:37:26 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 919 invoked by uid 76); 14 Mar 2005 17:38:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 914 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2005 17:38:48 -0000 Original-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Mail-Followup-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050314141146.GJ14286@digitus> X-MailScanner-To: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:747 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:747 On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:11:46PM +0100, Csillag Tamás wrote: > On 02/05, Vincent Danen wrote: > > On Feb 05, 2005, at 14:25, Csillag Tamás wrote: > > I meant to email the list earlier, but didn't get a chance. I did > > build dietlibc 0.28 and recompiled runit under it and it seems to work > > ok. At least the kernel doesn't kill or stall runit anymore. But I > > had to build without WANT_STACKGAP due to my gcc+SSP compiler (I don't > > know if this will make any difference to runit itself because I can't > > compiled dietlibc 0.28 with gcc+SSP with WANT_STACKGAP enabled). > > > > So far it seems good although I want to keep an eye on it more before I > > put it into production. > > I can confirm it really works. Felix fixed it in this release! > > Gerrit, is it possible to push these changes to sarge before release? > I mean dietlibc linked programs Possibly. What actually is needed? Disable STACKGAP in dietlibc, or just a re-build of the dependent packages with the current dietlibc 0.28 in Debian? Best would be you submit a report to the Debian BTS. Regards, Gerrit.