From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/802
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: mike@mikebell.org
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general
Subject: Re: "djbdns" under "runit" (Debian)?
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 19:22:49 -0700
Message-ID: <20050516022248.GB986@mikebell.org>
References: <20050516001901.GA7888@harfang.homelinux.org> <20050516003041.GD1000@mikebell.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505152111300.3744@e-smith.charlieb.ott.istop.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1116210189 9350 80.91.229.2 (16 May 2005 02:23:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 02:23:09 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: supervision@list.skarnet.org
Original-X-From: supervision-return-1038-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Mon May 16 04:23:07 2005
Return-path: <supervision-return-1038-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org>
Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14])
	by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DXVFU-0006Ss-6q
	for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Mon, 16 May 2005 04:22:29 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 12003 invoked by uid 76); 16 May 2005 02:23:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm
List-Post: <mailto:supervision@list.skarnet.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supervision-help@list.skarnet.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:supervision-unsubscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:supervision-subscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Archive: <http://www.skarnet.org/lists/>
Original-Received: (qmail 11998 invoked from network); 16 May 2005 02:23:10 -0000
Original-To: Charlie Brady <charlieb-supervision@budge.apana.org.au>
Mail-Followup-To: Charlie Brady <charlieb-supervision@budge.apana.org.au>,
	supervision@list.skarnet.org
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505152111300.3744@e-smith.charlieb.ott.istop.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:802
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:802

On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 09:13:24PM -0400, Charlie Brady wrote:
> runit programs don't transparently replace daemontools programs, 
> e.g. here's no tai64nlocal, and runsvctrl does not take the same args as 
> svc.

Neither one is likely to be used by a program depending on daemontools,
no? Though it would be better if runit were 100% daemontools compatible.
What are the differences between svn and runsvctrl? Is there anything
stopping the writing of an svc personality for runsvctrl?