From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/875 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gerrit Pape Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: runit - access to run script's exit status for finish? Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:46:22 +0000 Message-ID: <20050915144140.2536.qmail@1c84fcc3458bfc.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> References: <20050531190911.25938.qmail@adf4e649eec508.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <20050601000521.GB32490@grummit.biaix.org> <20050827192438.24239.qmail@573d30f8a31845.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <20050829080807.24479.qmail@b57f7a37a4464e.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <20050915092844.4037.qmail@6530944879c9e2.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1126795691 11344 80.91.229.2 (15 Sep 2005 14:48:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: supervision-return-1111-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Thu Sep 15 16:48:04 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EFuvP-0001px-Cj for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:41:19 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 17466 invoked by uid 76); 15 Sep 2005 14:41:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 17461 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2005 14:41:40 -0000 Original-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Mail-Followup-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:875 Archived-At: On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 08:18:06AM -0400, Paul Jarc wrote: > Gerrit Pape wrote: > > # sv status -r . > > # > > ./run didn't terminate yet, since the supervisor started. > > Since the supervisor started, or since the last time ./run was > started? The latter seems more useful to me. Yes, I agree. It should print nothing if ./run (or ./finish with -f) is currently running. Thanks, Gerrit.