From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/886
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general
Subject: Re: new "sv status" flags and exit-tracking patch, and misc.
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:12:20 +0000
Message-ID: <20050926100729.10530.qmail@c13d51208eed48.315fe32.mid.smarden.org>
References: <dgg734$tm7$1@sea.gmane.org> <20050919082620.21268.qmail@162d9f02f26a34.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <dgmnjf$o3s$1@sea.gmane.org> <dgn2ks$usn$1@sea.gmane.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1127729266 28127 80.91.229.2 (26 Sep 2005 10:07:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:07:46 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: supervision-return-1122-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Mon Sep 26 12:07:44 2005
Return-path: <supervision-return-1122-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org>
Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14])
	by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EJpt7-0001ah-JY
	for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:07:09 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 22709 invoked by uid 76); 26 Sep 2005 10:07:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm
List-Post: <mailto:supervision@list.skarnet.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supervision-help@list.skarnet.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:supervision-unsubscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:supervision-subscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Archive: <http://www.skarnet.org/lists/>
Original-Received: (qmail 22704 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2005 10:07:29 -0000
Original-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org
Mail-Followup-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <dgn2ks$usn$1@sea.gmane.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:886
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/886>

On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:13:30PM -0500, Charles Duffy wrote:
> Charles Duffy wrote:
> >Attached is a patch which attempts to stick to the items we agreed on.
> 
> Erk -- actually, that one was a little too overreaching as well, since 
> it changed "sv status" to provide the last exit status of finish (if 
> curently in run) or run (if currently in finish), if that program exited 
> with a status other than 0. Since the requested spec was that the output 
> of "sv status" (when called without flags) not be altered... well, 
> here's another attempt.

Hi Charles, thanks a lot for the patch.  This looks much better to me to
work with.  I'll try to find some time soon, to review it, and integrate
it into the next runit test version.  Thanks also for arranging with the
coding style of the runit project, it may well be that's a strange style
I use, but it's one I personally can read well and work good with.

Regards, Gerrit.