From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/952 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Radek Podgorny Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: runit not ready for cross-compilation Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 23:58:04 +0100 Message-ID: <200512172358.11513.radek@podgorny.cz> References: <200512120150.02803.radek@podgorny.cz> <439CDE9D.6090204@geeks.cl> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1759205.KvaWXqjzTZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134860348 32504 80.91.229.2 (17 Dec 2005 22:59:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: supervision-return-1188-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Sat Dec 17 23:59:07 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Enl0I-0001Xc-N8 for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 23:58:14 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 28031 invoked by uid 76); 17 Dec 2005 22:58:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 28025 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2005 22:58:35 -0000 Original-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 In-Reply-To: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:952 Archived-At: --nextPart1759205.KvaWXqjzTZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I though runit is a daemontools fork so we can give s... what djb thinks :-) Are you gonna implement my cross-compilation stuff? Do want me anything to = do=20 so you can actually do so? Radek Podgorny > On Sun, 11 Dec 2005, Alejandro Mery wrote: > > yes, runit has the same bad habit djb software has. compiling it's own > > build timers helpers in the same way that the runtime programs. > > > > what's the reason to use binary helpers instead of simple sh scripts for > > those tasks? > > I think djb's rationale is that he can create his own portability, and > doesn't depend on the portable implementation of features by the platform > provider. Except for the compiler's C implementation, that is :-) =2D-=20 GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0x98E56D84 --nextPart1759205.KvaWXqjzTZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDpJgD7mej6pjlbYQRArlxAJ0eRj9MJdCCalZdKga8fJFiP2ZgwQCgilam CyDXyeANi5FUneC1cckRlho= =mWqh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1759205.KvaWXqjzTZ--