From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/955 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Radek Podgorny Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: runit not ready for cross-compilation Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:30:46 +0100 Message-ID: <200512181130.49427.radek@podgorny.cz> References: <200512120150.02803.radek@podgorny.cz> <200512172358.11513.radek@podgorny.cz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3018572.gQpsAZQM0P"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134901911 20512 80.91.229.2 (18 Dec 2005 10:31:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: supervision-return-1191-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Sun Dec 18 11:31:48 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EnvoZ-0005I2-Rd for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:30:51 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 32110 invoked by uid 76); 18 Dec 2005 10:31:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 32104 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2005 10:31:11 -0000 Original-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 In-Reply-To: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:955 Archived-At: --nextPart3018572.gQpsAZQM0P Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Oh yeah, not I got it. By "you" I meant "you, the mailing list guys". I don't know who should I wr= ite=20 to to implement it... :-( Radek P. > On Sat, 17 Dec 2005, Radek Podgorny wrote: > > I though runit is a daemontools fork so we can give s... what djb thinks > > :-) > > Alejandro said that runit "has the same bad habit djb software has". Then > asked "what's the reason"? I simply made an attempt to answer that > question. > > I don't think that runit is a daemontools fork. My understanding is it's a > reimplementation of the same design pattern. > > > Are you gonna implement my cross-compilation stuff? > > Me? No. Why me? Are you? =2D-=20 GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0x98E56D84 --nextPart3018572.gQpsAZQM0P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDpTpZ7mej6pjlbYQRAm1BAJ4xovX6tPkIu+Pn3H5EDfGPFTSWQQCcCmTG CAqpSra07qqZr4/ijYL2vJ8= =IVPW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3018572.gQpsAZQM0P--