From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/971 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Radek Podgorny Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: runit not ready for cross-compilation Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 20:49:03 +0100 Message-ID: <200601032049.06956.radek@podgorny.cz> References: <200512120150.02803.radek@podgorny.cz> <20060103141219.10168.qmail@b2e6e1223b0c20.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1520996.Dxr0Lkt5O1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1136317756 9936 80.91.229.2 (3 Jan 2006 19:49:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 19:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: supervision-return-1207-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Tue Jan 03 20:49:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ets9Z-0001oP-P0 for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 20:49:05 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 6191 invoked by uid 76); 3 Jan 2006 19:49:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 6185 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 19:49:26 -0000 Original-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 In-Reply-To: <20060103141219.10168.qmail@b2e6e1223b0c20.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:971 Archived-At: --nextPart1520996.Dxr0Lkt5O1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Well, let's get rid of all of this, then... In general there is no way to do runtime tests when building for different= =20 architecture. Are these tests even needed? No other software I know of=20 doesn't do such things... Radek P. > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 01:50:00AM +0100, Radek Podgorny wrote: > > The root of this problem is that you have to distinguish between host > > (build) machine and target machine arch. Only single conf-cc and stuff > > simply isn't enough. The same for ./compile script and so on. > > Erm. To me it doesn't make much sense to do runtime tests on the > build system for programs that actually will run on the target system. > Surely I may be wrong though. > > Gerrit. =2D-=20 GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0x98E56D84 --nextPart1520996.Dxr0Lkt5O1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDutUy7mej6pjlbYQRAkc3AJwKGsGPTtNLtPBpMT3hRlgj5PYCFgCggwvv Un6ESdG+Pj2nNG94+/jPOG0= =oym3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1520996.Dxr0Lkt5O1--