From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1034 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alex Efros Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: timeout chpst -L Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:01:59 +0200 Organization: asdfGroup Inc., http://powerman.asdfGroup.com/ Message-ID: <20060214110159.GM6585@home.power> References: <20060213163054.GC2511@home.power> <20060213201807.GF6585@home.power> <20060214084509.24951.qmail@125e08fe97c020.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <20060214102323.GL6585@home.power> <20060214103625.4267.qmail@65cebaedea5163.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139914928 28313 80.91.229.2 (14 Feb 2006 11:02:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:02:08 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: supervision-return-1270-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Tue Feb 14 12:02:02 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F8xwW-0005Lb-8i for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:02:00 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 14990 invoked by uid 76); 14 Feb 2006 11:02:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 14984 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 11:02:21 -0000 Original-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Mail-Followup-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060214103625.4267.qmail@65cebaedea5163.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:1034 Archived-At: Hi! On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:36:25AM +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote: > Yes, it's the same race, different impact. Can you try this slightly > extended patch? Yep, now looks like it working. One more question. If prog exit with non-zero return code, it will be executed again (until number of tries reached). But if timeout happens and it will be killed by TERM or KILL - it will not be restarted. Why? -- WBR, Alex.