From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1043 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Joshua N Pritikin Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: apache2 logs -> svlogd Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:17:06 +0530 Message-ID: <20060214144706.GW3065@always.joy.eth.net> References: <20060213173813.GA6585@home.power> <20060213180402.GA30800@wolfpuppy.org.uk> <20060213182520.GE6585@home.power> <20060214142532.GA1378@sta.duo> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fjEAjMKpll6GDq3U" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139927930 15977 80.91.229.2 (14 Feb 2006 14:38:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:38:50 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: supervision-return-1279-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Tue Feb 14 15:38:47 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F91KD-00063o-Uu for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:38:42 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 19077 invoked by uid 76); 14 Feb 2006 14:39:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 19071 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 14:39:03 -0000 Original-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060214142532.GA1378@sta.duo> X-PGP-Key: 06E3 3D22 D307 AAE6 ACB4 6B44 A9CA A794 A4A6 0BBD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:1043 Archived-At: --fjEAjMKpll6GDq3U Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:25:32AM -0500, George Georgalis wrote: > >Recommended solution was put 'sleep 1' before svlogd, but for me it's a > >little ugly and unreliable. What isn't ugly about creating named pipes? I don't think the named pipe solution wins the beauty contest either. Ultimately we may need to go beat up apache developers. ;-) --fjEAjMKpll6GDq3U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD8e1qqcqnlKSmC70RApVUAKDDV+jf+cLDaN7AcTX1JHfbk+4yfACgqqKt VyZdO8WPcX2BRdAzvoooWmQ= =gUSm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fjEAjMKpll6GDq3U--